I always prefer thane.
1 Like
大神，能一起分享下新序列搭配的天赋加点么，谢谢！
hey any updates to the rotation? Thank you
is thear gona be an update for slayer build? 
1 Like
No, I really don’t like how Slayer plays and thane works almost as well with better GSE usage. I simmed at 212 on thane and 214 on Slayer.
Hmm but for like raiding nownif u look at warcraftlogs all top are slayer
While Slayer sims better, it’s also much more difficult to reproduce consistently in GSE. I’ve tried and it’s just all over the place without a lot of manual firings. Thane is almost as good and works well with GSE. My free time is extremely limited so I’m only updating what I play regularly ATM as I don’t have the usual hours and hours I spend to generate a new sequence.
Thane:
Slayer:
2 Likes
One thing I’d recommend, Farre, is to stop comparing things to the top players on Warcraftlogs. The only way you will ever reach the same damage profile as those players is by putting in the same amount of time and effort they do, manually playing the class at that level. When it comes to GSE sequences, there is simply no way you are going to match the damage output of players who are doing everything by hand with perfect optimization.
Instead, compare your damage profile to players who are using similar tools and playing at a similar level. You will usually find, especially for Warrior, that your results are completely fine.
So my advice is this: use what he has created for general use. If you want to use Slayer sequence, look for versions shared by other players, or take the time to learn how to build your own sequences in GSE. That way, you can create something that fits the playstyle you want and refine it over time.
3 Likes
Hello, first of all I want to thank Orbalisk for his tremendous work and for his time. I’ve been following this forum for years with different classes, and we’re very lucky to have you here. Your macros are fantastic!
I really enjoy playing Slayer, and I had a great time with the old macros when they were part of the meta. I hope that when you have some time, you can take another look at them. For now, I’ll stick with Mountain.
I use these macros a lot to be able to play decently on handhelds. Thank you so much for your macros and for your time — you’re awesome!!!
1 Like
3.2 work both aoe and st and 3.4 st and aoe are separred right withone yall be using i feel i think i may be using the sequence worrg i put the key on my left bottom at my mouse is ok to use like that or have a diff way to use it
I still use 3.2 manual with great success.
same doing so good atm did yall use it on side bottom on mouse or im using ir worrg
I use my mouse thumb button. Razor blackaddler 2.
What kind of MT build are you using for this sequence, it isnt updated? Everyone I see outside of this thread is using Slayer for M+. MT is mostly used for PvP.
One thing I’d honestly recommend you do from this moment on is actually read through the thread. It’s pretty long, so maybe try reading a few replies above yours, because what you asked has already been asked by several other people not too long ago. You could literally just scroll up and read it. I know it’s a tough process to move your finger or use the scroll wheel in situations like this, but come on.
As for your comment about most warriors using slayer builds, do you know why most people are using slayer builds? It’s because they’re trying to follow the top 1% of players. And if you actually watch some of those players and listen to what they say, they’ve repeatedly mentioned that all the builds are relatively the same. So if you think you’re going to be hot stuff just because you want to run a slayer build, maybe take a moment to understand why you’re here in the first place.
This website and the services it provides are primarily for people who have issues with their hands or are visually impaired. It’s meant to help those individuals. It’s not meant to be an “I push this button and the game plays itself for me” solution. If you’re coming in with that mentality, then you really shouldn’t be worried about which build you’re using in the first place. You should be grateful that people like Orbalisk have taken the time to create these sequences for others to use.
So yes, what I just said is absolutely passive-aggressive, and I’m aware of that. But you also need to understand the concept of reading the thread before jumping in with the same thing that’s already been said multiple times. Orbalisk has already explained, if you scroll up, that he doesn’t want to make a slayer build and is focusing on what he’s already done. So you can either take it or leave it. That’s pretty much it.
2 Likes
quick question the 3.2 works for both st and aoe does the 3.4 do it aswell or i actually have to use 2 separed sequences like u said if so working on a 3.3 for both st/aoe one ?
3.2 does both well, 3.4 will need you to bind an ST and an AoE. I’m doing pvp with 3.2 just fine and I prefer it.
1 Like
thanks im doing pve only for now im using 3.2 aswell
1 Like
Does the sequence use trinkets like puzzle box? I see in the lines on the macros is says use 13, but isn’t that the ring slot?
13 & 14 are trinket slots.