Not really. Usually I press rushing jade wind before pull and my group gives me a few seconds. I also tab through the enemies, so I hit everything at least once. I mean sure, the fury grabs aggro some times, when bursting for 180k, but most of the time a simple taunt does the trick.

Maybe it’s because I am running the macro quite fast (~25-40 MS)

that’s just dps going zugzug… get a hunter in the group with misdirect or a rogue with tricks of the trade :slight_smile:
this is why I love my feral, it builds up dps so I never get aggro :smiley:

For reference, Nokhud Offensive +16 timed. Using the AoE Macro.

Hello, may i ask if i am pressing the macro it only stays as a Question Mark and the abilities or skills are not showing, but the macro is working perfectly well, may i ask is there a work around on it? thank you

Thanks for making me love BM again, this is so sweet and making it so fun to perform in M+. Both ST och AoE works great.

lol, for a sec there i had to go look what class/spec this was. when you said BM, i thought i clicked into a Beastmaster chat. just wan ted to say this to put smile on people faces.

exact same happend to me :smiley: :smiley: :smiley:

Again, I have to thank you for the macro. Cleared heroic Vault with no problems.
Only thing bothering me is consistency in single target fights. On Terros HC I even have 91% log for damage with the single target macro. The other encoutners are about 60% logs. Maybe I am doing something fundamentally wrong.

Great work!

your logs are compared to the top top people right ? so what I would do is:

thats what I would do

Hello mate trying out your macro today, just wondering if there was a specific reason that you have the modifiers in every block rather than just one of the Macro Variables at the bottom like most other macros do?

Will post some feedback for you after doing some testing.

Hello, i haven’t played in a while, may i ask if this is still viable on 10.0.7? or i will wait for the update? thank you

nothing has really changed from 10.0.5 to 7 … so yes this still works


can we delete the variable at the very end? seems not used, am i wrong?

Will this be updated for 10.1? Seems like a fun macro!